data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a51b/9a51b032dbf637c618fbbd2348662c165dd0b2f1" alt="The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c71e/2c71ededc4a7ca3167e257fe1426545e719c7bf2" alt=""
I heard a snippet of a radio interview with Michelle Alexander, author of
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindnessdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c10b0/c10b052750acd5d0d3f9b495754281d4d46c7483" alt=""
.It sounds like a fascinating book with an important argument. The brief clip I heard talked about the different penalties for cocaine versus crack-cocaine. A person has to hold 100 times the amount of cocaine to be sentenced in the same way as a person holding crack-cocaine.
Recently, the Senate passed a bill to reduce the disparity to 18:1. Alexander argues that Whites are more likely to be arrested for cocaine possession, while African-Americans are more likely to be caught with crack-cocaine. As a result, African-Americans are more likely to be incarcerated. Having the status as a past felon disqualifies them to vote, and so the drug laws act as a "color blind" way to keep blacks from voting.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading my blog and posting a comment! : )